Conspiracy Department

All Black people talk about in the hood are conspiracies. Here is the truth who is collectively out to sabotage blacks viewed through the lens of educated street culture as a serious displine.

Department Overview

Further Study

The following links are sub-departments organized by agents or evidence.

Contextual Framing

A conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime or a secret plot for an evil or illegal purpose. In a legal context, this involves both the agreement and an "overt act" to further the plan. The term is also used to describe a conspiracy theory, which is an explanation for an event or situation that invokes a conspiracy by powerful actors, often in a way that is unproven.

Legal definition

A conspiracy is an agreement between two or more individuals to carry out an illegal act. To be a crime, the agreement must be followed by an "overt act" from one of the parties involved. Example: In some jurisdictions, agreeing to commit a crime and taking a step to advance it, such as buying a weapon or meeting to plan the details, is illegal.

Conspiracy theories

These are explanations for events that involve secret plots by powerful groups, often making direct evidence hard to source. Many political conspiracies are classified by national security and only later exposed when any accountability is impossible because all actors involved are dead.

Researcher’s Position (Joseph Malone)

Malone Global University approaches conspiracy studies as a discipline of truth-seeking grounded in historical fact, legal reasoning, and civic ethics. We study not to speculate, but to prevent, transforming rumor into reason, and theory into structural reform. This makes me a conspiracy "researcher" rather than a "theorist". Everyone has a "theory", I provide logic grounded in historical fact. This leads to building robust systems to prevent any future harm whether real or imagined as a threat.

Editorial Note

Malone Global University distinguishes between conspiracy as crime, conspiracy theory as narrative, and inquiry as method. This framework allows students to critically evaluate claims, evidence, and historical context without defaulting to dismissal or sensationalism.

Classification System of Conspiracies

Conspiracies can be listed by type (perpetrator), level of verifiable evidence, or by damage to society being claimed. "Type" of conspiracy is who is being accused: government agencies, industrial corporations, or private groups like ngos, charities, religions, and organized crime.

This taxonomy provides a framework for analyzing conspiracy theories involving African Americans and related global figures. Each category distinguishes between intent, evidence, and cultural impact (teaching angle).

Category Intent Example Case Evidence Strength Teaching Angle
Political Suppression Silence activism or dissent COINTELPRO vs. MLK High Government transparency and accountability
Economic & Corporate Exploitation Control or profit from Black creativity Michael Jackson catalog disputes Medium Industry ethics and intellectual property rights
Scientific, Medical & Technological Experimentation or neglect Tuskegee Syphilis Study High Bioethics and informed consent
Cultural & Psychological Manipulation Shape public perception through media Hollywood stereotypes Medium Media literacy and image politics
Esoteric, Spiritual & Fringe Explain oppression through supernatural or hidden order Illuminati celebrity myths Low Symbolic meaning and myth analysis
Cover-Up & Erasure Suppress historical truth or evidence Tulsa Massacre of 1921 High Archival reconstruction and historical justice

Each conspiracy can be tagged by Type, Evidence Tier, and Cultural Impact. This helps students and researchers evaluate patterns, not just claims. Key Examples categorized by their primary conspiracy type:

Political Suppression

Cases such as COINTELPRO, the surveillance of Malcolm X, and the deaths of Black leaders illustrate patterns of suppression justified as national security operations.

Economic & Corporate Exploitation

Corporate control over creative output—music catalogs, film rights, or invention patents—often fuels theories about ownership theft and exploitation.

Scientific, Medical & Technological

Historical malpractice, such as the Tuskegee Study and Henrietta Lacks, forms the factual basis for modern mistrust in medicine and science among African Americans.

Cultural & Psychological Manipulation

Media narratives and industry patterns influence identity formation and reinforce stereotypes, sometimes leading to suspicion of deliberate image control.

Esoteric, Spiritual & Fringe

From celebrity “Illuminati” myths to lost-tribe theories, these conspiracies often express deeper cultural anxieties and spiritual interpretations of power.

Cover-Up & Erasure

Lost records, suppressed archives, and erased histories—such as those surrounding Black Wall Street—represent the tangible side of conspiratorial silencing.

Veracity

This page surveys three categories of claims that circulate about conspiracies targeting African Americans: verified historical abuses, widespread but disputed theories, and modern fringe claims. Where applicable we distinguish solid documentary evidence from plausible but unproven assertions, and we provide discussion questions and primary-source leads for classroom use.

1. Verified Historical Conspiracies

These events are supported by archival records, government reports, judicial findings, or admitted policy. They are foundational to understanding contemporary mistrust.

2. Widespread & Debated Claims

These theories grew out of documented abuses and community experience. Some contain kernels of truth or documented connections; others remain unproven.

3. Modern Fringe Claims

Often amplified online, these theories usually lack documentary support and blend symbolic critique with literal allegation.

Why These Stories Persist

  1. Historical Precedent: Real conspiracies (Tuskegee, COINTELPRO) prove that distrust is justified.
  2. Systemic Opacity: Secrecy around policing, surveillance, and policy indicates guilt.
  3. Undenial Truth: Personal experience is irrefutable in the face of denial and cover-ups.
  4. Counter Forensics: Counter conspiracies are created to distract and discredit actual conspiracies.

Resources

The following books are by Illuminati (Latin for dickhead) agents who snitch on themselves. Sometimes they follow a specific format to gain reader trust: 1. appearing as a truther 2. staging it as agenda free search for truth 3. claim they are not experts merely curious citizens 4. admit they are as vulnerable to manipulation as anyone else.