Dossier Files

Defense Department Dossier Index

The Dossier Files are institutional intelligence documents maintained by the Malone Global University Defense Department. They identify, distinguish, document, and assess organizations, movements, ideologies, institutions, informal networks, identity claims, and behavioral phenomena that may affect Malone institutions.

A dossier is not a prosecution, endorsement, propaganda document, or final institutional judgment. Each file is intended to support situational awareness, institutional vetting, risk assessment, historical understanding, and informed decision-making.

Entries should distinguish verified facts, attributed claims, public perceptions, disputed allegations, organizational identities, independent actors, affiliates, and conclusions reached through institutional analysis.

Government and Political Subjects

• Central Intelligence Agency
• Democratic Party
• Federal Bureau of Investigation
• Make America Great Again

Civil Rights, Identity, and Social Movements

• Black Hebrews
• Black Lives Matter
• Black Native Americans
• Foundational Black Americans
• Moors
• Nation of Islam
• National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
• Sellouts
• Southern Christian Leadership Conference

Fraternal, Membership, and Private Organizations

• Boulé
• Greek Fraternal Societies
  • Phi Theta Kappa
  • Sigma Pi Phi
• Prince Hall Freemasonry
  • Prince Hall Shriners
• Scottish Rite
• Shriners International
• Skull and Bones
• York Rite

Street Gangs, Prison Gangs, and Organized Crime

• Aryan Brotherhood
• Black Guerrilla Family
• Bloods
• Crips
• Italian Mafia
• Mara Salvatrucha
• Mexican Mafia
• Norteños

Extremist and Hate-Based Movements

• Ku Klux Klan
• Neo-Nazis

Research and Evidence Standards

Dossier findings should be evaluated according to the strength and nature of the available evidence. Documented facts, official records, attributed allegations, testimony, public statements, circumstantial evidence, institutional inference, and speculation must not be presented as though they possess equal evidentiary weight.

Responsibility should be assigned only where the available evidence establishes an identifiable relationship between the conduct at issue and the organization, governing body, chapter, affiliate, officer, member, or independent actor being assessed.