The Central Idea

Consider the inequality

\[ x+y\le6. \]

This does not describe one point or one line.

The equation

\[ x+y=6 \]

forms the boundary line.

The inequality

\[ x+y\le6 \]

includes every point on one side of that line, together with the line itself.

Now add another constraint:

\[ x\ge0. \]

Only points satisfying both conditions remain.

The common region is called the feasible region.

From Intervals to Regions

In one variable,

\[ x\ge2 \]

describes a ray on the number line.

In two variables,

\[ x+y\le6 \]

describes a two-dimensional region.

The underlying logic is the same:

What Does Feasible Mean?

A point is feasible if it satisfies every constraint in the problem.

A point is infeasible if it violates even one required constraint.

For example, suppose

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \]

and

\[ x+y\le6. \]

The point

\[ (2,3) \]

is feasible because

\[ 2\ge0, \] \[ 3\ge0, \]

and

\[ 2+3\le6. \]

But

\[ (4,4) \]

is infeasible because

\[ 4+4\le6 \]

is false.

Boundary Equations

To graph a linear inequality, first replace the inequality symbol with equality.

For

\[ 2x+y\le8, \]

the boundary equation is

\[ 2x+y=8. \]

This line separates the plane into two half-planes.

The original inequality selects one of them.

Half-Planes

A line divides the coordinate plane into two regions called half-planes.

For the line

\[ x+y=6, \]

one half-plane contains points satisfying

\[ x+y<6, \]

and the other contains points satisfying

\[ x+y>6. \]

The line itself contains the points where

\[ x+y=6. \]

Inclusive and Strict Boundaries

If the inequality uses

\[ \le \]

or

\[ \ge, \]

the boundary line belongs to the solution set.

If the inequality uses

\[ < \]

or

\[ >, \]

the boundary line is excluded.

This is the two-dimensional analogue of closed and open endpoints on a number line.

Solid and Dashed Boundaries

When graphing by hand, an included boundary is traditionally drawn as a solid line.

An excluded boundary is traditionally drawn as a dashed line.

Thus:

\[ y\le2x+3 \]

uses a solid boundary line, while

\[ y>2x+3 \]

uses a dashed boundary line.

Determine Which Side to Keep

Once the boundary line is drawn, we must determine which side satisfies the inequality.

One method is to solve for \(y\).

For example,

\[ x+y\le6 \]

becomes

\[ y\le6-x. \]

This means points whose \(y\)-coordinates lie on or below the line

\[ y=6-x. \]

Testing a Point

When the correct side is not immediately obvious, choose a test point not lying on the boundary.

The origin

\[ (0,0) \]

is often convenient.

For

\[ 2x+y\le8, \]

substitute \((0,0)\):

\[ 2(0)+0\le8. \]

This is true, so the half-plane containing the origin is the solution side.

When the Origin Is Not a Good Test Point

If the boundary passes through

\[ (0,0), \]

then the origin cannot distinguish the two sides.

For example,

\[ y>2x \]

has boundary

\[ y=2x, \]

which contains the origin.

Choose another point such as

\[ (0,1). \]

Then

\[ 1>2(0) \]

is true, so the side containing \((0,1)\) is selected.

Several Constraints Mean Intersection

Suppose a problem requires

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \]

and

\[ x+y\le6. \]

Each inequality defines a half-plane.

The feasible region is the intersection of all three.

A point must lie in every selected half-plane simultaneously.

Nonnegativity Constraints

Applied models often include

\[ x\ge0 \]

and

\[ y\ge0. \]

These are called nonnegativity constraints.

They restrict the solution to the first quadrant when \(x\) and \(y\) represent quantities that cannot be negative, such as:

Example: Three Constraints

Consider

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ x+y\le6. \]

The first inequality keeps points on or to the right of the \(y\)-axis.

The second keeps points on or above the \(x\)-axis.

The third keeps points on or below the line

\[ x+y=6. \]

The intersection is a triangular region in the first quadrant.

Boundary Intersections

The corners of a polygonal feasible region occur where boundary lines intersect.

For

\[ x=0, \] \[ y=0, \]

and

\[ x+y=6, \]

the intersection points are

\[ (0,0), \] \[ (6,0), \]

and

\[ (0,6). \]

These are called vertices or corner points of the feasible region.

Vertices Come from Active Constraints

At a vertex, two or more boundary constraints are usually satisfied with equality.

For example, at

\[ (6,0), \]

we have

\[ x+y=6 \]

and

\[ y=0. \]

These constraints are active at that point because the point lies exactly on their boundaries.

Inactive Constraints

A constraint may be satisfied without being exactly on its boundary.

At

\[ (2,2), \]

the constraint

\[ x+y\le6 \]

is satisfied because

\[ 2+2<6. \]

It is not active there because equality does not hold.

Bounded Feasible Regions

A feasible region is bounded if it fits inside some finite part of the plane.

For example,

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ x+y\le6 \]

forms a bounded triangle.

Neither \(x\) nor \(y\) can grow without limit while remaining feasible.

Unbounded Feasible Regions

A feasible region is unbounded if it extends indefinitely in at least one direction.

For example,

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ x+y\ge6 \]

contains points arbitrarily far from the origin.

Unbounded does not mean “no solution.” It means the solution set has no finite outer boundary in at least one direction.

Empty Feasible Regions

Sometimes constraints are incompatible.

For example,

\[ x+y\le2 \]

and

\[ x+y\ge5 \]

cannot both be satisfied.

The feasible region is therefore

\[ \varnothing. \]

This is the two-dimensional analogue of contradictory inequalities on the number line.

A Feasible Region Can Be a Line

Suppose

\[ x+y\le4 \]

and

\[ x+y\ge4. \]

Both constraints hold only when

\[ x+y=4. \]

So the feasible set collapses from a two-dimensional region to a one-dimensional line.

A Feasible Region Can Be a Point

Enough independent constraints can reduce the feasible set to one point.

For example,

\[ x\ge2, \] \[ x\le2, \] \[ y\ge3, \]

and

\[ y\le3 \]

force

\[ (x,y)=(2,3). \]

The feasible region is then the singleton set

\[ \{(2,3)\}. \]

Dimension Can Collapse

A feasible set does not have to fill an area.

Depending on the constraints, it may be:

Constraints can reduce the available degrees of freedom.

Testing Whether a Point Is Feasible

Suppose the constraints are

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ 2x+y\le8, \]

and

\[ x+2y\le8. \]

Test

\[ (2,2). \]

We have

\[ 2\ge0, \] \[ 2\ge0, \] \[ 2(2)+2=6\le8, \]

and

\[ 2+2(2)=6\le8. \]

Therefore, \((2,2)\) is feasible.

One Failed Constraint Is Enough

Using the same system, test

\[ (4,2). \]

The first three conditions give

\[ 4\ge0, \] \[ 2\ge0, \] \[ 2(4)+2=10\not\le8. \]

Once one required constraint fails, the point is infeasible.

There is no need for it to fail every constraint.

Finding Vertices Algebraically

Suppose two boundary lines are

\[ 2x+y=8 \]

and

\[ x+2y=8. \]

Solve the two equations simultaneously.

From the first,

\[ y=8-2x. \]

Substitute into the second:

\[ x+2(8-2x)=8. \]

Simplify:

\[ x+16-4x=8, \] \[ -3x=-8, \] \[ x=\frac83. \]

Then

\[ y=\frac83. \]

So the boundary lines intersect at

\[ \left(\frac83,\frac83\right). \]

Not Every Boundary Intersection Is Feasible

When several constraints are present, the intersection of two boundary lines is only a candidate vertex.

It must still satisfy every other constraint.

A line intersection outside the common shaded region is not a vertex of the feasible region.

Candidate Vertices and Verification

A reliable vertex workflow is:

  1. identify relevant pairs of boundary lines;
  2. solve each pair for its intersection;
  3. substitute the candidate point into every constraint;
  4. keep only the feasible intersections.

This parallels the distinction between candidate solutions and verified solutions in equation solving.

Strict Inequalities and Missing Edges

Consider

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \]

and

\[ x+y<6. \]

The triangular interior is feasible, but points on

\[ x+y=6 \]

are excluded.

The region therefore has an open edge along that boundary.

Mixed Boundary Inclusion

A feasible region can contain some boundary segments but exclude others.

For example,

\[ x>0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ x+y\le5 \]

excludes the \(y\)-axis, includes the \(x\)-axis, and includes the sloping line

\[ x+y=5. \]

Boundary inclusion must be tracked constraint by constraint.

Linear Constraints

A linear constraint in two variables has a form such as

\[ ax+by\le c. \]

Its boundary is the line

\[ ax+by=c. \]

The feasible side is one of the two half-planes determined by that line.

Several linear constraints produce intersections of half-planes.

Polygonal Feasible Regions

When a finite collection of linear inequalities forms a bounded feasible set, the boundary is often a polygon.

Its sides lie along boundary lines, and its vertices occur where active boundaries meet.

This geometric structure becomes important in optimization.

Why Feasible Regions Matter in Optimization

Suppose a business can produce quantities \(x\) and \(y\), but labor, material, budget, and capacity impose constraints.

The feasible region contains every production plan that obeys all restrictions.

An optimization problem then asks:

Among all feasible points, which one makes an objective such as profit largest or cost smallest?

Optimization comes after feasibility.

Constraints Before Objectives

A point with excellent profit is irrelevant if it violates required constraints.

Therefore, modeling often proceeds in this order:

  1. define variables;
  2. write constraints;
  3. determine the feasible region;
  4. then evaluate an objective over that region.

Application: Production Limits

Suppose a shop makes products \(A\) and \(B\).

Let

\[ x=\text{number of units of }A \]

and

\[ y=\text{number of units of }B. \]

Suppose labor imposes

\[ 2x+y\le10 \]

and material imposes

\[ x+2y\le8. \]

Also, production quantities cannot be negative:

\[ x\ge0,\qquad y\ge0. \]

The feasible region contains all production combinations that satisfy every limitation.

Context May Require Integer Points

The graphical feasible region for production quantities may contain noninteger points such as

\[ (2.5,1.75). \]

But if \(x\) and \(y\) count indivisible objects, only lattice points with integer coordinates may be physically meaningful.

The continuous feasible region is still useful, but context may restrict the actual choices to

\[ (x,y)\in\mathbb{Z}^2. \]

Continuous Versus Discrete Feasibility

If quantities can vary continuously, every point in the region may be allowed.

If quantities must be integers, only selected points in the region are feasible.

This distinction leads toward integer programming and discrete optimization later.

Application: Budget and Minimum Requirements

Suppose two activities cost \$4 and \$6 per unit, with a budget of at most \$60:

\[ 4x+6y\le60. \]

Suppose at least \(5\) total units are required:

\[ x+y\ge5. \]

And suppose

\[ x\ge0,\qquad y\ge0. \]

The feasible region is the set of nonnegative combinations satisfying both the budget ceiling and the minimum-output requirement.

Redundant Constraints

A constraint is redundant if removing it does not change the feasible region.

For example, suppose

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ x+y\le5, \]

and

\[ x+y\le10. \]

The last constraint adds nothing because every point satisfying

\[ x+y\le5 \]

already satisfies

\[ x+y\le10. \]

Dominating Constraints

When two constraints limit the same direction, one may be stronger than the other.

For example,

\[ x\le4 \]

is stronger than

\[ x\le7. \]

If both are required, the second is redundant.

Recognizing redundancy can simplify a model before graphing or solving.

Constraints Can Encode Geometry

The inequalities

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ x\le4, \] \[ y\le3 \]

describe a rectangle.

The inequalities

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ x+y\le5 \]

describe a triangle.

Different systems of inequalities create different geometric regions.

Nonlinear Feasible Regions

Feasible regions are not limited to straight-line boundaries.

For example,

\[ x^2+y^2\le25 \]

describes the disk inside and on a circle of radius \(5\).

The constraint

\[ y\ge x^2 \]

describes the region on or above a parabola.

Linear inequalities produce polygonal regions, while nonlinear inequalities can produce curved boundaries.

Boundary Logic Still Generalizes

For a nonlinear inequality such as

\[ x^2+y^2\le25, \]

the boundary equation is

\[ x^2+y^2=25. \]

The inequality then selects one side of that boundary: the interior of the circle.

The same boundary-and-region reasoning still applies.

Graphical Verification

A graph can help verify whether an algebraically described region makes sense.

Useful checks include:

Algebraic Verification

A graph is useful, but exact verification comes from substitution.

If a point appears feasible, substitute it into every original inequality.

If a vertex is found graphically, solve the relevant boundary equations algebraically when an exact coordinate is needed.

Graphical and symbolic methods strengthen one another.

Worked Example: Basic Feasible Region

Describe the region satisfying

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ x+y\le4. \]

The boundaries are

\[ x=0, \] \[ y=0, \]

and

\[ x+y=4. \]

The feasible region is the triangle in the first quadrant bounded by these lines.

Its vertices are

\[ (0,0), \] \[ (4,0), \]

and

\[ (0,4). \]

Worked Example: Two Sloping Constraints

Consider

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ 2x+y\le8, \] \[ x+2y\le8. \]

The sloping boundary lines intersect at

\[ \left(\frac83,\frac83\right). \]

The axis intersections relevant to the feasible region include

\[ (4,0) \]

and

\[ (0,4). \]

Together with

\[ (0,0), \]

these points form the vertices of a bounded polygonal feasible region.

Worked Example: Incompatible Constraints

Consider

\[ x+y\le3 \]

and

\[ x+y\ge7. \]

The first requires points on one side of

\[ x+y=3, \]

while the second requires points on the opposite side of the parallel line

\[ x+y=7. \]

No point satisfies both.

Therefore,

\[ \boxed{\varnothing}. \]

Worked Example: Unbounded Region

Consider

\[ x\ge0, \] \[ y\ge0, \] \[ x+y\ge4. \]

The first two constraints keep the region in the first quadrant.

The third keeps points on or above the line

\[ x+y=4. \]

The solution extends indefinitely upward and rightward.

So the feasible region is unbounded.

A Reliable Graphing Workflow

  1. Write each inequality clearly.
  2. Replace each inequality symbol with equality to obtain its boundary.
  3. Graph each boundary.
  4. Use a solid boundary for \(\le\) or \(\ge\), and a dashed boundary for \(<\) or \(>\).
  5. Determine the correct side of each boundary.
  6. Keep only the overlap of all required regions.
  7. Identify vertices or special boundary points when useful.
  8. Verify representative points algebraically.

A Reliable Feasibility Workflow

  1. Define the variables and their domains.
  2. Translate each restriction into an inequality.
  3. Include contextual restrictions such as nonnegativity or integrality.
  4. Construct the common feasible region.
  5. Check whether the region is empty, bounded, unbounded, or lower-dimensional.
  6. Verify candidate points and vertices against every original constraint.

Common Errors

Graphing Only the Boundary

An inequality usually represents a region, not merely the line where equality holds.

Shading the Wrong Side

Use a test point or solve for \(y\) to determine which half-plane satisfies the inequality.

Using a Solid Boundary for a Strict Inequality

Strict inequalities exclude the boundary.

Forgetting That All Constraints Must Hold

The feasible region is an intersection, not a union, when every condition is required.

Assuming Every Line Intersection Is a Vertex

Candidate intersections must satisfy all other constraints.

Ignoring Contextual Restrictions

Negative or fractional values may be mathematically feasible but physically meaningless in a particular model.

Confusing Unbounded with Empty

An unbounded region has infinitely many feasible points; an empty region has none.

Practice

1. Test a Point

Does

\[ (2,1) \]

satisfy

\[ x\ge0, \qquad y\ge0, \qquad x+y\le4? \]
Check Answer

Yes.

\[ 2\ge0, \] \[ 1\ge0, \]

and

\[ 2+1=3\le4. \]

2. Identify a Boundary

What is the boundary line of

\[ 3x+2y\le12? \]
Check Answer \[ 3x+2y=12. \]

3. Included or Excluded?

Is the boundary of

\[ y>2x-1 \]

part of the feasible region?

Check Answer

No. The inequality is strict, so the line

\[ y=2x-1 \]

is excluded.

4. Bounded or Unbounded?

Classify the feasible region:

\[ x\ge0, \qquad y\ge0, \qquad x+y\le5. \]
Check Answer

Bounded. The constraints form a triangle in the first quadrant.

5. Empty Region

What is the feasible set of

\[ x+y<2 \]

and

\[ x+y>5? \]
Check Answer \[ \varnothing. \]

6. Find a Boundary Intersection

Find the intersection of

\[ x+y=6 \]

and

\[ x=2. \]
Check Answer

Substitute \(x=2\):

\[ 2+y=6, \]

so

\[ y=4. \]

The intersection is

\[ (2,4). \]

7. Contextual Feasibility

Suppose \(x\) and \(y\) count whole products. Is

\[ (2.5,3) \]

a feasible production plan even if it satisfies all continuous inequalities?

Check Answer

Not if the products must be counted in whole units. The model also requires

\[ x,y\in\mathbb{Z}_{\ge0}. \]

Key Ideas

Where This Leads

Feasible regions extend the idea of solution sets from intervals on a number line to regions in the coordinate plane.

This prepares the way for systems of inequalities, linear programming, optimization, constraint modeling, convex regions, and later multidimensional problems in which equations and inequalities define the space of allowable solutions.