Speak and Write Language Series
Unit IV — 自立した表現 · Chapter 19 of 20
19

総合プロジェクトの準備Capstone Preparation

Synthesis, revision, and genre control · Speak and Write Japanese: Independent Communication and Advanced Expression

Chapter Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:

  1. Recognize and use vocabulary for project planning, sources, outlines, drafts, revisions, presentations, and peer response.
  2. Use synthesis connectors to combine information from more than one source or idea into a single connected passage.
  3. Attribute information to a source using によると and related attribution language already active from Chapter 11.
  4. Use paragraph transitions to move clearly between an introduction, supporting points, and a conclusion.
  5. Revise a draft for register, adjusting between polite and plain style, or between formal and conversational stance markers, according to genre.
  6. Identify and correct common error patterns from earlier chapters in one's own writing.
  7. Read and respond to a peer's outline or draft with organized, considerate feedback.
  8. Plan the outline, sources, and format for the Chapter 20 capstone project using only authorized Volume III systems.

Communication Scenario

中村さん has asked each volunteer to prepare a short final project about some aspect of the recycling group's work, to be shared with the whole team at next month's meeting. Emma has decided to write and present about how the group's donation-collection schedule changed after 田中さん's proposal was adjusted, and what the group learned from that process. Before she can write a full draft, Emma needs to plan her sources, organize her ideas into an outline, decide on the right register for a mixed formal-and-friendly audience, and get feedback from 中村さん on a first draft. This chapter walks through exactly that preparation process, which every learner will also use to plan their own Chapter 20 capstone project.

  1. The learner selects a topic and lists at least two sources of information to draw on.
  2. The learner produces a short outline with an introduction, at least two supporting points, and a conclusion.
  3. The learner writes at least one sentence that synthesizes information from two sources or ideas.
  4. The learner revises a short passage for register consistency.
  5. The learner gives or responds to peer feedback on a draft or outline.
ごい — Core Vocabulary

Core Vocabulary

This chapter introduces vocabulary for project planning, sources, outlines, drafts, revisions, presentations, and peer response. These items support the practical work of preparing a multi-paragraph final project, rather than academic research methodology at a specialized level.

JapaneseReadingEnglish meaningDomain
計画けいかくplan; planningProject planning
資料しりょうmaterials; sourcesSources
構成こうせいstructure; compositionOutlines
下書きしたがきdraftDrafts
修正しゅうせいcorrection; revisionRevisions
発表はっぴょうpresentationPresentations
感想かんそうimpression; responsePeer response
全体ぜんたいthe whole; overallOutlines
結論けつろんconclusionOutlines
まとめるまとめるto summarize; to bring togetherProject planning
見直すみなおすto review; to reconsiderRevisions
引用いんようquotation; citationSources

構成 (structure) and まとめる (to bring together) recur throughout this chapter, since outline-building and synthesis are the chapter's central skills.

れんしゅう — Practice: Sort the twelve words above into the seven domain categories from this chapter's objectives, then write one sentence using any two of them together.

もじ — Script and Kanji Focus

Script and Kanji Focus

This chapter reviews kanji from across Volume III rather than introducing a large new set, and adds a small number of new kanji for planning, structure, and revision. Following the Furigana / Reading-Support Matrix, furigana continues to be reduced on kanji consolidated in earlier chapters, while this chapter's new kanji carry furigana at first use.

計画
けいかく
plan
New — Ch. 19
資料
しりょう
source material
New — Ch. 19
構成
こうせい
structure
New — Ch. 19
修正
しゅうせい
revision
New — Ch. 19
結論
けつろん
conclusion
New — Ch. 19
全体
ぜんたい
the whole
New — Ch. 19
引用
いんよう
quotation
New — Ch. 19
発表
はっぴょう
presentation
Recycled — Ch. 12
Script Strategy — Building a personal terminology list

Before drafting a longer project, it is useful to gather the kanji and vocabulary you expect to reuse throughout the piece into a short personal terminology list, with readings noted for anything uncertain. This is a practical strategy that professional and academic writers also use, not a special beginner accommodation.

As you build your terminology list for the Chapter 20 project, decide which words are consolidated enough to write without furigana and which still need reading support, following the same reduction logic used throughout this volume.

れんしゅう — Practice: Cover the readings in the kanji cards above and try to read each compound aloud from memory, then check your answers. Then list three additional kanji from earlier chapters that you expect to use in your own Chapter 20 project.

Pronunciation and Listening Focus

Pronunciation Focus — Presentation pacing and paragraph breaks

When reading a multi-paragraph draft aloud, a brief pause at each paragraph transition helps a listener follow the structure, in the same way a written paragraph break helps a reader. Practice reading a short outline aloud, pausing slightly longer at transitions such as まず, 次に, and 最後に than at ordinary sentence-final pauses.

  • まず、田中さんの提案について説明します。 — first, I will explain about Tanaka-san's proposal
  • 次に、グループがどう調整したかをまとめます。 — next, I will summarize how the group made adjustments
  • 最後に、そこから学んだことを話します。 — finally, I will talk about what was learned from it

Grammar: Synthesis and Revision

This chapter authorizes synthesis connectors, source attribution, paragraph transitions, register revision, and error analysis, building directly on the attribution language from Chapter 11, the presentation transitions from Chapter 12, and the stance and hedging language from Chapters 17 and 18. Together these let you combine information from more than one source, organize a multi-paragraph piece clearly, and revise a draft for consistent register.

Synthesis connectors — combining information from more than one idea or source

Purpose: to connect two related pieces of information into one organized statement, showing how they relate to each other.

  • 田中さんの提案だけでなく、他のメンバーの意見も参考にした。I referred not only to Tanaka-san's proposal but also to other members' opinions.〜だけでなく〜も, adding a second source
  • アンケートの結果と、会議での話し合いを合わせて考えると、多くの人が新しい方法に賛成しているようだ。Considering the survey results together with the discussion at the meeting, it seems that many people support the new method.〜と〜を合わせて考えると, combining two sources
  • この二つの点から、グループの調整はうまくいったと言える。From these two points, it can be said that the group's adjustment went well.〜から言える, drawing a synthesized conclusion

Synthesis connectors do not introduce new grammar forms on their own; they recombine attribution, comparison, and conclusion language already active from earlier chapters into patterns that connect two or more ideas at once.

Attribution review — によると and related source markers

Purpose: to show clearly where a piece of information came from, a skill first introduced in Chapter 11 and now applied to a longer, multi-source project.

  • 中村さんによると、今回の調整はうまくいったそうだ。According to Nakamura-san, this adjustment reportedly went well.によると + そうだ, reported information
  • アンケートによると、多くのボランティアが新しい方法を支持している。According to the survey, many volunteers support the new method.によると, written source
Language Focus — Keeping attribution consistent across a longer piece

In a short paragraph, a single attribution phrase is usually enough. In a longer, multi-paragraph piece, mark each new source clearly the first time it appears, and use context, topic continuity, and occasional repetition of the source name rather than repeating a full attribution phrase in every sentence, which can feel repetitive and heavy in natural Japanese writing.

Paragraph transitions

Purpose: to guide a reader or listener clearly from one part of an organized piece to the next.

Building Block — A three-part outline frame
まず、[導入]。次に、[支持点1と支持点2]。最後に、[結論]。
Open with an introduction marked by まず, develop supporting points marked by 次に, and close with a conclusion marked by 最後に.
まず、田中さんの提案について説明します。次に、グループがどう話し合い、調整したかをまとめます。最後に、そこから学んだことを話します。
First, I will explain Tanaka-san's proposal. Next, I will summarize how the group discussed it and made adjustments. Finally, I will talk about what was learned from it.
  • この点について、もう少し詳しく説明する。I will explain this point in a little more detail.internal transition within a section
  • 以上のことから、全体として次のように結論できる。From the above, overall it can be concluded as follows.全体として, moving toward the conclusion

Register revision — adjusting a draft for genre and audience

Purpose: to review a draft and make its register consistent throughout, given a stated audience and purpose.

ContextExampleRegister notes
Formal presentation to the whole group今回の調整はうまくいったと考えられます。です/ます style, ようです or 〜と考えられる rather than casual hedges
Casual note to a close friend in the group今回の調整、うまくいったみたい。plain style, みたい acceptable, topic particle often dropped
Written report or summary document今回の調整はうまくいったと言えるだろう。written-style stance marker, avoids conversational fillers

When revising a draft for the Chapter 20 capstone, first decide on a single target register for the whole piece based on its audience and purpose, then check every sentence against that choice rather than mixing polite, plain, and written-style forms without a clear reason.

Error analysis — reviewing a draft for common Volume III error patterns

Purpose: to identify and correct the kinds of errors most likely to appear in a longer Volume III piece.

  • 受け身の主語が抜けていないか確認する。Check whether the subject of a passive sentence has been dropped when it is actually needed.passive/perspective review, Chapter 7
  • 条件文の「と/ば/たら/なら」を正しく使い分けているか確認する。Check whether と, ば, たら, and なら have been used correctly for their different conditional meanings.conditional review, Chapter 9
  • ようですとみたいですの使い分けが場面に合っているか確認する。Check whether the choice between ようです and みたいです fits the context.register review, Chapter 18

Grammar Practice

  1. Write one sentence that synthesizes information from two different sources using a pattern from this section.
  2. Write a short three-part outline for your Chapter 20 project using まず, 次に, and 最後に.
  3. Take one sentence and rewrite it in three registers: formal presentation, casual note, and written report.
  4. Review a short passage you wrote in an earlier chapter and identify one error pattern from the Error Analysis list above.

Model Dialogue

Setting: Emma shares her outline and a short draft paragraph with 中村さん for feedback before writing the full project.

エマ 構成を考えてみました。まず提案の説明、次に調整の話し合い、最後に学んだことです。どう思いますか。 I've thought about the structure. First an explanation of the proposal, next the discussion of the adjustment, and finally what was learned. What do you think?
中村さん いい構成だと思います。資料は、何を使う予定ですか。 I think that's a good structure. What materials are you planning to use?
エマ アンケートの結果と、あの日の話し合いのメモを使うつもりです。この二つを合わせて考えると、調整はうまくいったと言えると思います。 I plan to use the survey results and the notes from that day's discussion. Considering these two together, I think it can be said that the adjustment went well.
中村さん いいですね。下書きの一部を見せてもらえますか。 That's good. Could you show me part of the draft?
エマ はい、どうぞ。「今回の調整、うまくいったと思う」と書いたんですが、これでいいですか。 Yes, here you go. I wrote "I think this adjustment went well," but is this okay?
中村さん 内容はいいんですが、発表するなら、少し丁寧な言い方に直したほうがいいかもしれません。「今回の調整はうまくいったと考えられます」のような形はどうでしょうか。 The content is good, but if you're going to present it, it might be better to revise it into a slightly more polite phrasing. How about a form like "It can be considered that this adjustment went well"?
エマ なるほど、全体をその文体に見直します。ありがとうございます。 I see, I'll review the whole piece to match that style. Thank you.

ないようりかい — Comprehension questions:

  1. What three parts make up Emma's outline?
  2. What two sources does Emma plan to use, and how does she combine them in her conclusion?
  3. What register problem does Nakamura-san identify in Emma's draft sentence, and how does she suggest fixing it?

Guided Practice

タスク1 — Domain sort. Sort the twelve vocabulary items from this chapter's Core Vocabulary table into the seven domains from the chapter objectives, and add one additional recycled word for each domain.

タスク2 — Outline building. Choose a topic from your own experience with the recycling group, a class project, or another familiar activity, and write a three-part outline using まず, 次に, and 最後に.

タスク3 — Synthesis sentence. Given two short pieces of information (real or invented), write one sentence that combines them into a single synthesized statement.

タスク4 — Register revision. Take one sentence you wrote in an earlier chapter and rewrite it for a formal presentation register, checking it against the comparison table in the Grammar section.

Listening Practice

Ask your instructor, a partner, or a text-to-speech tool to read the following passage aloud at a natural pace.

きくタスク — Planning a final project aloud

今回の発表では、まず田中さんの提案について説明します。次に、アンケートの結果と話し合いのメモを合わせて、グループがどう調整したかをまとめます。最後に、この経験から学んだことについて話します。資料としては、アンケートと会議のメモを使う予定です。

聞くタスク — Listening task: Identify (1) the three parts of the outline and the transition word that marks each one, (2) the two sources of information mentioned, and (3) the phrase used to say the two sources will be combined.

This passage discusses planning a school or community project; if organizing a large project or receiving feedback on your own work feels stressful, remember that support is always available for this or any topic in the course.

Speaking Practice

コントロールされた練習 — Controlled practice: Building the frame

  1. まず、_____。次に、_____。最後に、_____。
  2. _____によると、_____そうです。
  3. _____と_____を合わせて考えると、_____と言えます。

コミュニケーションタスク — A one-minute project pitch

Using the outline you built in Guided Practice タスク2, prepare a one-minute spoken pitch of your Chapter 20 project idea: state your topic, name your outline's three parts using まず, 次に, and 最後に, and mention at least one source you plan to use. A partner or instructor should respond with one question or one piece of feedback, which you should acknowledge using softening or repair language from Chapter 18 if needed.

ひとりでもできる練習 — Solo practice: Recording two registers

Record yourself describing your project plan twice: once in a formal presentation register, and once in a casual register as if telling a close friend. Listen back and note at least two concrete differences between the two recordings.

Reading Practice

Read the following short passage, written for a general audience rather than for specialists, then answer the questions below.

下書きの見直しについて — About reviewing a draft

エマは、発表の下書きを書き終えたあと、中村さんに見てもらった。中村さんによると、内容はとてもよかったが、文体が少し不統一だったそうだ。友達に話すような言い方と、丁寧な発表の言い方が、同じ下書きの中に混ざっていた。

エマは、全体を丁寧な発表の文体に統一するために、下書きをもう一度見直した。かもしれない、ようです、みたいですなどの表現も、発表にふさわしいかどうか、一つずつ確認した。見直したあと、下書きはずっと分かりやすくなったと、中村さんは感想を伝えた。

ないようりかい — Comprehension questions:

  1. According to Nakamura-san, what was the main problem with Emma's first draft?
  2. What kind of language did Emma find mixed together in her draft?
  3. What did Emma do to fix the problem?
  4. What was Nakamura-san's impression of the draft after Emma revised it?
  5. Identify one attribution or hedging expression in the passage, and explain what it marks.

Writing Workshop

In this workshop you will produce an outline and a short opening paragraph for your Chapter 20 capstone project, similar to the planning Emma completed with 中村さん's help.

  1. Choose a topic connected to a familiar or semi-specialized subject from this volume, such as a community activity, a school project, or a personal experience you can support with two sources.
  2. List at least two sources you will draw on, such as notes, a survey, an interview, or a reading.
  3. Write a three-part outline using まず, 次に, and 最後に.
  4. Write one synthesis sentence that combines information from your two sources.
  5. Write a short opening paragraph in your chosen register, introducing your topic and outline.
  6. Revise your paragraph using the checklist below.

チェックリスト — Editing checklist:

  • My outline has a clear introduction, at least two supporting points, and a conclusion.
  • My paragraph uses at least one synthesis connector to combine two ideas or sources.
  • My paragraph attributes information to its source where appropriate.
  • My paragraph uses one consistent register throughout, matched to its intended audience.
  • I have checked my paragraph against at least one error pattern from the Error Analysis section.

Culture and Communication

Culture in Context — Peer review and shared preparation

In many Japanese school, community, and workplace settings, sharing an outline or draft with a colleague, mentor, or supervisor before a final presentation is a routine and expected step, rather than a sign of weak preparation. Seeking early feedback, as Emma does with 中村さん in this chapter, reflects one common and valued approach to project work.

Regional Note — Variation in presentation conventions

Expectations for how formal a presentation should sound, how much feedback is exchanged beforehand, and how directly peer feedback is given can vary by school, workplace, region, and generation. The patterns modeled in this chapter reflect one common approach rather than a single universal standard.

Language Note — Synthesis and attribution across languages

Combining information from more than one source and marking where each idea came from is a skill needed in academic and professional writing across many languages. Comparing how your own language signals synthesis and attribution can help you notice how Japanese expressions such as によると and 合わせて考えると serve a similar function, adjusted for Japanese written conventions.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Common Mistake — Mixing polite and plain style within one formal piece

Error: *今回の調整はうまくいったと思う。それに、みんな満足しています。 mixes plain and polite predicates in the same formal passage.

Correction: 今回の調整はうまくいったと思います。それに、みんな満足しています。 — choose one register for the whole piece and check every sentence against it.

Common Mistake — Presenting synthesized information without attribution

Error: *多くの人が新しい方法に賛成している。 presents a claim from a survey as if it were the writer's own direct knowledge.

Correction: アンケートによると、多くの人が新しい方法に賛成しているようだ。 — mark the source and, where appropriate, the degree of certainty.

Common Mistake — Skipping the outline and drafting directly

Error: Writing a full draft without first listing an introduction, supporting points, and a conclusion often produces a passage that is difficult for a reader to follow, even when individual sentences are accurate.

Correction: Build a short outline using まず, 次に, and 最後に before drafting, as modeled in the Building Block box in the Grammar section, and check the finished draft against that outline.

Chapter Review

Section A — ごい (Vocabulary)

1. Sort the twelve Core Vocabulary words into their seven domains, and add one additional recycled word for each domain.

Section B — もじ (Script)

1. Write the readings for 計画, 資料, 構成, 修正, 結論, 全体, and 引用 from memory, then check them against the Script and Kanji Focus section.

Section C — ぶんぽう (Grammar)

1. Complete the four Grammar Practice items above, if you have not already done so.

2. Explain, in your own words, why keeping one consistent register matters in a formal multi-paragraph piece, and give one example of a register mismatch and its correction.

Section D — どっかいりかい (Reading comprehension)

1. Look again at the Reading Practice passage. Identify every synthesis connector, attribution expression, and hedging or impression expression, and explain what each one contributes.

Section E — かくこと (Writing)

1. Complete your outline and opening paragraph following the Writing Workshop steps, as part of the Practical Performance Task below.

Section F — はなすこと (Speaking)

1. Deliver or record your one-minute project pitch, as part of the Practical Performance Task below.

Practical Performance Task

パフォーマンスタスク

総合プロジェクトの準備 — Planning and pitching your capstone project

Using the topic you chose in the Writing Workshop, complete both parts below.

  • Written plan: Submit your three-part outline, your list of at least two sources, and your revised opening paragraph, including at least one synthesis connector and one attribution expression.
  • Spoken pitch: Deliver a one-minute spoken pitch of your project plan and respond to at least one question or piece of feedback from a partner or instructor.

Assessment focus: a clear three-part outline; accurate and natural use of synthesis connectors and attribution language; consistent register matched to a stated audience; evidence of error-pattern review; and comprehensibility for a listener or reader unfamiliar with the specific topic. This plan becomes the foundation for the Chapter 20 final project.

Answer Key

Core Vocabulary and Script Review

Open-ended for the sorting task; check readings against the Script and Kanji Focus section above. Reasonable domain placements: 計画/まとめる → project planning; 資料/引用 → sources; 構成/全体/結論 → outlines; 下書き → drafts; 修正/見直す → revisions; 発表 → presentations; 感想 → peer response.

Grammar Practice

  1. Model answer: アンケートの結果と話し合いのメモを合わせて考えると、調整はうまくいったと言える。
  2. Model answer: まず提案について説明する。次に話し合いの過程をまとめる。最後に学んだことを話す。
  3. Model answers: formal — 今回の調整はうまくいったと考えられます。; casual — 今回の調整、うまくいったと思う。; written report — 今回の調整はうまくいったと言えるだろう。
  4. Open-ended; learners should identify one specific error pattern (for example, a dropped passive subject, a conditional confusion, or a ようです/みたいです mismatch) in their own earlier writing.

Model Dialogue — Comprehension

  1. Emma's outline has an explanation of the proposal, the discussion of the adjustment, and what was learned.
  2. Emma plans to use the survey results and the meeting notes, and combines them to support the conclusion that the adjustment went well.
  3. Nakamura-san notes that Emma's draft sentence is too casual for a presentation and suggests revising it to a more polite form such as と考えられます.

Listening Practice — Model summary

The outline has three parts: まず introduces the proposal, 次に summarizes how the group adjusted it using the survey and meeting notes together, and 最後に discusses what was learned. The two sources mentioned are the survey and the meeting notes, combined using 合わせて.

Reading Practice — Comprehension

  1. According to Nakamura-san, the content was good, but the register was inconsistent.
  2. Emma found casual, friend-like phrasing mixed together with formal presentation phrasing.
  3. Emma revised the whole draft to use one consistent, polite presentation register, checking hedging expressions one by one.
  4. Nakamura-san felt the draft had become much clearer after the revision.
  5. Model answer: によると marks the source of Nakamura-san's comment; the passage's use of ようです and みたいです illustrates the register check Emma performed on her own hedging language.

Chapter Review — Sections A and B

Open-ended; check against the Core Vocabulary and Script and Kanji Focus sections above.

Chapter Review — Section C

Open-ended for item 1; see Grammar Practice guidance above. For item 2, a correct explanation notes that mixed registers make a formal piece feel inconsistent and can confuse the audience about the intended tone, and gives one example, such as switching mid-paragraph between plain です/ます endings.

Chapter Review — Section D

Model answer: 合わせて考えると synthesizes the two sources; によると attributes the comment to Nakamura-san; ようです and みたいです mark Emma's careful review of her own hedged claims for the presentation register.

Chapter Review — Sections E and F, and Practical Performance Task

These are open-ended production tasks. Evaluate the written plan against the Writing Workshop checklist above, and evaluate the spoken pitch against the assessment focus listed under the Practical Performance Task.

Looking Ahead

いまできること — What you can do now

You can plan a multi-paragraph project by building a clear three-part outline, combine information from more than one source using synthesis connectors, attribute information to its source, revise a draft for consistent register matched to its audience, and check your own writing against common Volume III error patterns. You have a completed outline, source list, and opening paragraph ready to build into a full final project.

第二十章へContinuing to Chapter 20

Chapter 20, 最終プロジェクト:自立した表現 (Final B2 Project), completes Unit IV and Volume III by bringing together explanation, opinion, cause and result, keigo basics, passive and causative forms, conditionals, attribution, formal writing, narrative, data, and stance into one integrated capstone project, built directly on the outline and plan prepared in this chapter.