Speak and Write Language Series
Ìdìpọ̀ V — Ìpéye Gíga, Ìtúmọ̀, àti Àkànṣe · Unit 2 — Expanding into Independent Performance
6

Ìfojúsùn, Ìṣètò Ìròyìn, àti Àsọyé

Focus, Information Structure, and Rhetoric · Speak and Write Yorùbá: Advanced Precision, Interpretation, and Specialization

Chapter Objectives

By the end of this chapter, you will be able to:

  1. Identify the information-structural work performed by "ni" in identification, emphasis, and contrast.
  2. Distinguish subject focus, object focus, and predicate/action focus, and explain how each reshapes word order without disturbing the clause's basic grammar.
  3. Use contrastive focus to correct, challenge, or sharpen a claim in argument and debate.
  4. Interpret and produce question-focus interactions, including focused wh-questions and their focused answers.
  5. Coordinate strong pronouns with focus constructions in connected speech and writing without destabilizing reference.
  6. Apply focus constructions rhetorically to build a nuanced, persuasive argument rather than treating focus as decorative emphasis.
  7. Explain, in writing, how a focused Yorùbá sentence differs in information structure from its most natural English translation.
  8. Edit a passage containing focus constructions for accuracy of word order, tone, and pronoun coordination, building on the editing habits from Chapters 3 and 5.

Opening Communication Scenario

Adé has been invited to a community radio program to respond to a caller who claimed that young people are entirely responsible for a decline in respectful greeting customs. Adé disagrees with the caller's framing, but not with every part of the claim: some responsibility does lie with younger speakers, but Adé believes the caller has placed the emphasis in the wrong place. Rather than simply denying the claim outright, Adé wants to redirect it — to say, in effect, "it is not only young people who are responsible; it is also the pace of modern life that is responsible." Making this kind of precise, persuasive correction in Yorùbá depends on controlling focus: choosing exactly which part of a sentence "ni" identifies, emphasizes, or contrasts, and doing so with stable tone and accurate word order under the pressure of live, spontaneous speech.

  1. This chapter treats focus and emphasis as tools for shaping an argument, not as optional stylistic flourishes.
  2. You will practice identifying what a speaker has chosen to focus, and why, in argument, correction, and explanation.
  3. By the end of the chapter, you will be able to build and deliver a short focused argument responding to a public claim.

Core Vocabulary

This chapter's vocabulary names the tools of argument, correction, and information structure: the terms needed to talk about what a sentence emphasizes, how a speaker contrasts one claim with another, and how a debate or rhetorical exchange is organized.

Focus, rhetoric, and debate vocabulary — Chapter 6
YorùbáEnglishFunction
ìfojúsùnfocus / emphasisgrammatical-term noun
ìṣètò ìròyìninformation structuregrammatical-term noun phrase
àtakò-ọ̀rọ̀contrast / counter-claimrhetorical-term noun phrase
àtúnṣe àkọsílẹ̀correction (of a claim)rhetorical-term noun phrase
àsọyérhetoric / persuasive speechgenre noun
àríyànjiyàn gbangbapublic debategenre noun phrase
ìdáhùn onífojúsùnfocused answeroutput-type noun phrase
ìdí tí a fi ń sọ bẹ́ẹ̀the reason a claim is maderhetorical-analysis noun phrase
ìtẹ̀numọ́stress / underscoring a pointrhetorical-term noun
ìjíròrò olóyèreasoned discussiongenre noun phrase
Ohùn Ìfihàn

Pronunciation Focus — Focused Delivery and Contrastive Tone

Focus — Marking emphasis without distorting tone

A focused constituent in Yorùbá is often produced with slightly greater intensity, a small pitch adjustment, and a brief pause immediately after "ni," but none of this is permitted to override the underlying high, mid, or low tone of the words involved. Learners under the pressure of argument or debate sometimes compensate for emphasis by flattening tone or by inserting an English-style stressed syllable, which can blur meaning rather than sharpen it.

  • Practice saying a focused constituent first at normal conversational pace with full tone accuracy, then again with the extra emphasis of a debate setting, checking that no tone has shifted.
  • Notice the brief, natural pause after "ni" in a focus construction, and avoid replacing it with an English-style vocal stress on a single syllable.
  • In contrastive focus, keep the two contrasted constituents tonally distinct and clearly separated, rather than running them together at speed.
  • Remember that persuasive delivery in Yorùbá depends on clear word order and stable tone working together, not on volume or pitch alone.
Gírámà — Ìfojúsùn, Ìṣètò Ìròyìn, àti Àsọyé

Grammar — Focus, Information Structure, and Rhetoric

This chapter develops advanced control of "ni" focus constructions and their rhetorical application in argument, correction, and debate. It builds on focus systems already consolidated through Volume IV and on the clause-level precision developed in Chapter 5, rather than introducing a new tone, orthography, or core clause system.

"Ni" Identification, Emphasis, and Fronting

Pattern

Ìdí-fojúsùn + ni + (ìyókù gbólóhùn)

To focus a constituent, that constituent is fronted to the beginning of the clause and followed by "ni." The rest of the clause continues in its ordinary structure, often with a resumptive pronoun left in the original position of the focused element when that element was the subject. Fronting and "ni" together signal that the fronted element — not the rest of the sentence — carries the new or emphasized information.

Adé ni ó ka ìwé náà. Ìwé náà ni Adé ka.

It is Adé who read the book (subject focus, with resumptive "ó" in subject position). It is the book that Adé read (object focus, no resumptive pronoun needed for the object). Notice how fronting a different constituent changes what the sentence emphasizes without changing its basic truth.

Subject Focus, Object Focus, and Predicate Focus

Focus types and their structural behavior
Focus typeStructural descriptionRhetorical use
Subject focusThe subject is fronted before "ni," and a resumptive subject pronoun remains in the clause.Identifies or singles out who performed an action, often to correct a misattribution.
Object focusThe object is fronted before "ni," and the object position after the verb is left empty.Identifies or singles out what was affected, chosen, or referred to.
Predicate/action focusThe verb or a verb phrase is repeated or nominalized and fronted with "ni," followed by the full clause.Emphasizes that an action did occur, often to counter a denial or doubt.

Contrastive Focus and Correction

  • Kì í ṣe àwọn ọ̀dọ́ nìkan ni ó jẹ̀bi; àyíká ìgbésí ayé òde-òní náà ni ó tún jẹ̀bi. It is not only young people who are at fault; the pace of modern life is also at fault. negated focus ("kì í ṣe... ni") paired with a second affirmative focus ("...ni ó tún jẹ̀bi") to redirect emphasis
  • Kì í ṣe Túndé ni ó sọ bẹ́ẹ̀; Adé ni. It is not Túndé who said that; it is Adé. contrastive focus correcting a misattributed subject; "ni" alone can stand as a short focused answer

Contrastive focus does not merely restate information; it actively rejects one candidate and substitutes another. In argument and debate, this structure allows a speaker to correct a claim precisely, rather than issuing a vague denial.

Question Focus and Focused Answers

Pattern

Ta/Kí/Níbo/Ọjọ́ wo + ni + (ìyókù ìbéèrè)? → Ìdáhùn-fojúsùn + ni + (ìyókù gbólóhùn).

Wh-words such as "ta" (who), "kí" (what), and "níbo" (where) combine with "ni" to form focused questions, which anticipate a focused answer built on the same pattern. A learner who answers a focused question with an unfocused clause produces a grammatically possible but rhetorically flat response, missing the parallel structure the question invites.

Ta ni ó kọ́kọ́ sọ ọ̀rọ̀ yìí? Ìyá Àgbà ni ó kọ́kọ́ sọ ọ́.

Who first said this? It was Ìyá Àgbà who first said it. The focused question and the focused answer share the same fronting-plus-"ni" structure, making the exchange feel sharply targeted rather than generic.

Focus with Strong Pronouns and Discourse Coordination

Recognition note — Strong pronouns carry the emphatic load

When the focused constituent is a pronoun rather than a full noun phrase, Yorùbá typically uses a strong or emphatic pronoun rather than a weak subject or object pronoun, since weak pronouns cannot bear the emphatic weight of a focus construction. Tracking which pronoun form is required — and keeping reference clear across a longer argument that focuses different participants in turn — is part of advanced discourse control, not a separate grammar topic.

As in Chapter 5's treatment of serialization, choosing whether to focus a constituent is not a stylistic option layered on top of a finished sentence; it is a decision about which piece of information the sentence is organized to deliver. A persuasive Yorùbá argument depends on choosing focus deliberately, sentence by sentence, rather than defaulting to plain declarative word order throughout.

Ìjíròrò Àpẹẹrẹ

Model Dialogue

Ipò: Adé wà lórí rédíò àdúgbò, ó ń dáhùn ìbéèrè olùgbọ́ kan nípa ìdí ìhùwàsí ìkíni.
Setting: Adé is on a community radio program, responding to a listener's question about the reasons behind greeting behavior.

OLÙDÁ RÉDÍÒ Ẹnìkan pè wá lóní, ó sọ pé àwọn ọ̀dọ́ nìkan ni ó jẹ̀bi ìyípadà tí ó ṣẹlẹ̀ sí bí àwọn èèyàn ṣe ń kí ara wọn. Kí ni o rò nípa èyí, Adé? Someone called us today and said it is only young people who are to blame for the change in how people greet one another. What do you think about this, Adé?
ADÉ Kì í ṣe àwọn ọ̀dọ́ nìkan ni ó jẹ̀bi; àyíká ìgbésí ayé òde-òní náà ni ó tún jẹ̀bi. Ìyára tí gbogbo ẹni ń gbé báyìí ni ó ń dín àkókò ìkíni kù, kì í ṣe àìbìkítà àwọn ọ̀dọ́ nìkan. It is not only young people who are at fault; the pace of modern life is also at fault. It is the speed at which everyone now lives that is reducing the time given to greeting, not only the carelessness of young people.
OLÙDÁ RÉDÍÒ Ta ni o rò pé ó lè yí ipò yìí padà? Who do you think can change this situation?
ADÉ Àwọn òbí àti àwọn olùkọ́ ni ó kọ́kọ́ ní ojúṣe náà, àmọ́ àwa fúnra wa pẹ̀lú ni ó yẹ kí a máa fi àpẹẹrẹ hàn ní ojoojúmọ́. It is parents and teachers who first bear that responsibility, but it is we ourselves too who ought to be setting the example every day.
OLÙDÁ RÉDÍÒ Kí ni ohun kan ṣoṣo tí o fẹ́ kí olùgbọ́ wa rántí lẹ́yìn ìjíròrò yìí? What is the one thing you want our listeners to remember after this discussion?
ADÉ Ìbọ̀wọ̀ ni kì í yí padà pẹ̀lú àkókò; ọ̀nà tí a ń gbà fi hàn án ni ó lè yí padà. It is respect that does not change with time; it is the way we choose to show it that can change.

Guided Practice

  1. Take a plain declarative sentence and produce three versions of it that focus the subject, the object, and the predicate in turn, following the Grammar section's patterns.
  2. Identify the contrastive focus construction Adé uses in the Model Dialogue to redirect blame away from young people alone, and explain what two elements are being contrasted.
  3. Write a focused wh-question and its parallel focused answer, modeled on the "Ta ni...?" exchange in the Model Dialogue.
  4. Find the sentence in the Reading Practice passage that uses a strong pronoun in a focus construction, and explain why a weak pronoun would not work there.
  5. Rewrite one of Adé's focused statements from the Model Dialogue as a plain, unfocused declarative sentence, and explain what rhetorical effect is lost.
Apá Gbígbọ́

Listening Practice

Ask an instructor, study partner, or qualified Yorùbá speaker to read the passage below aloud at a measured, natural pace, or read it aloud yourself and then cover it before answering.

If no speaker is available, this is a Listening Script for Independent Use. Machine text-to-speech must be checked by a qualified Yorùbá speaker before use as a pronunciation model.

"Lẹ́yìn ìjíròrò rédíò náà, Túndé bi Adé pé kí ló mú kí ó yan láti lo ìfojúsùn dípò kí ó kàn sọ ọ̀rọ̀ rẹ̀ ní ọ̀nà gbogbogbò. Adé dáhùn pé, nígbà tí ẹnìkan bá ti ṣàkọsílẹ̀ àṣìṣe kan ní gbangba, kì í ṣe títako ọ̀rọ̀ náà lásán ni ó pọndandan; àtúnṣe pàtàkì ni ó yẹ kí ẹni náà mú wá, ìyẹn ni pé, ó yẹ kí a fi ìdí hàn kedere ohun tí ó jẹ́ òtítọ́, kì í ṣe gbogbo ohun tí ẹnìkejì sọ. Ó tún sọ pé ìfojúsùn ni ó jẹ́ kí olùgbọ́ mọ̀ pàtó ibi tí àṣìṣe wà àti ibi tí ojútùú gidi wà, dípò kí wọ́n kàn gbọ́ àríyànjiyàn tí kò ní ìdí kankan tí ó ṣe kedere. Túndé wí pé òun ti lóye báyìí pé ìfojúsùn kì í ṣe ọ̀ṣọ́ ọ̀rọ̀ lásán; ohun èlò kan pàtàkì ni fún ẹni tí ó fẹ́ jiyàn ní ọ̀nà tí ó ní ìdí tí ó ṣe kedere."

1. Why did Adé say focus is necessary when correcting a public claim, according to the passage?

2. What does Adé say focus helps a listener know precisely?

3. What did Túndé say he now understood about focus?

Iṣẹ́ rẹ — Your task: Answer the three questions above in complete Yorùbá sentences.

Apá Ìsọ̀rọ̀

Speaking Practice

Tier 1 — Supported

With a partner, take turns reading Adé's radio responses from the Model Dialogue aloud, paying attention to the brief pause after "ni" and to keeping the contrasted elements tonally distinct.

Tier 2 — Guided

Practice asking and answering three focused wh-questions with a partner, modeled on the "Ta ni...?" exchange, alternating who asks and who answers.

Tier 3 — Independent

Choose a mild public claim you disagree with in part (for example, about a habit, a trend, or a community practice) and deliver a short spoken response in Yorùbá that uses at least one subject-focus construction, one contrastive-focus construction, and one focused question-and-answer pair.

Apá Kíkà

Reading Practice

Ẹnu Kò Lè Rọ̀ Sí Ìjíròrò Gbangba — There Is No Room for Careless Speech in Public Debate

Ní ìpàdé àwọn olóyè àdúgbò ní ọ̀sẹ̀ kan sẹ́yìn, ọ̀rọ̀ dìde nípa ta ni ó yẹ kí ó ru àjàgà ìtọ́jú ọ̀nà gbangba. Ọ̀kan lára àwọn olóyè náà sọ pé, "Kì í ṣe ìjọba nìkan ni ó ní láti tọ́jú ọ̀nà; àwa fúnra wa pẹ̀lú ni ó ní láti kópa." Àwọn kan tako ọ̀rọ̀ yìí, wọ́n sọ pé owó tí ìjọba ń gbà lọ́wọ́ àwọn aráàlú ni kò tọ́ sí iṣẹ́ tí a ń rí. Àgbà kan tí orúkọ rẹ̀ ń jẹ́ Bàbá Adédèjì dìde, ó sì sọ pé, "Kì í ṣe owó nìkan ni ìṣòro náà; ìṣọ̀kan láti ṣiṣẹ́ pọ̀ ni kò sí. Ohun tí a nílò ni pé kí ẹnì kọ̀ọ̀kan mọ ipa tirẹ̀, kí ó sì ṣe é, kì í ṣe kí ẹnì kọ̀ọ̀kan dúró de ẹlòmíràn." Ó fi kún un pé, "Ẹni tí ó bá fẹ́ mọ ta ni ó ṣe àṣìṣe gan-an ni ó yẹ kí ó kọ́kọ́ wo ohun tí òun fúnra rẹ̀ ti ṣe, kì í ṣe ohun tí ẹnìkejì rẹ̀ ṣe nìkan." Ọ̀rọ̀ Bàbá Adédèjì mú kí àríyànjiyàn náà yí padà, ó sì mú kí gbogbo àwọn tí ó wà níbẹ̀ gbà pé ìṣọ̀kan ni ó yẹ kí wọ́n kọ́kọ́ dá sílẹ̀ ṣáájú kí wọ́n tó bèèrè ìrànlọ́wọ́ tuntun lọ́wọ́ ìjọba.

1. Identify the contrastive focus construction one elder uses to argue that residents, not only the government, share responsibility.

2. What does Bàbá Adédèjì say the real problem is, using a focus construction?

3. How did Bàbá Adédèjì's statement change the direction of the debate, according to the passage?

Iṣẹ́ rẹ — Your task: Answer the three questions above in complete Yorùbá sentences.

Apá Kíkọ

Writing Workshop

Produce a short persuasive or argumentative passage that responds to a public claim, uses focus constructions accurately to identify, emphasize, and contrast information, and includes at least one focused question-and-answer exchange. Full tone marks and dot-under letters are required throughout.

  • Choose a mild public claim or common opinion you wish to respond to, agree with in part, or redirect (for example, about a habit, a community issue, or a generational difference).
  • List the specific claims you want to affirm, deny, or redirect, and decide which constituent in each sentence should carry the focus.
  • Draft at least one subject-focus sentence, one object- or predicate-focus sentence, and one contrastive-focus correction, following the patterns in the Grammar section.
  • Add one focused wh-question and its parallel focused answer, modeled on the Model Dialogue.
  • Write a short passage (150–200 words) that connects these focused statements into a coherent, persuasive response, applying the Chapter 3 proofreading procedure before finalizing the text.
  • Read your finished passage aloud and confirm that each focus construction is delivered with a clear pause after "ni" and no loss of tone accuracy.
  • Focused argument writing checklist — track your own draft
    ComponentLength / targetMarkers to verify
    Àkọsílẹ̀ àríyànjiyàn (Claim list)Brief planning listEach claim assigned a clear focus target
    Gbólóhùn onífojúsùn (Focus constructions)3+ constructions, at least one contrastiveCorrect fronting, resumptive pronoun where required, accurate tone
    Ìbéèrè àti ìdáhùn onífojúsùn (Focused question and answer)1 pairParallel fronting-plus-"ni" structure in both question and answer
    Àyọkà (Passage)150–200 wordsFull tone marks, dot-under letters, proofread using Chapter 3 procedure

    Include

    • at least one subject-focus and one object- or predicate-focus construction
    • at least one contrastive-focus correction that redirects a claim
    • one focused wh-question with a parallel focused answer
    • a strong pronoun in at least one focus construction, if a pronoun is focused
    • full tone marks and dot-under letters throughout

    Avoid

    • using a weak subject or object pronoun where a focus construction requires a strong pronoun
    • omitting the resumptive subject pronoun after subject focus
    • answering a focused question with a flat, unfocused declarative sentence
    • letting emphasis distort or flatten any tone-bearing syllable
    Editing Checkpoint
    • Each focus construction fronts the correct constituent and uses "ni" accurately.
    • Subject-focus constructions retain the required resumptive pronoun; object-focus constructions do not add an unnecessary one.
    • At least one contrastive-focus correction clearly rejects one candidate and substitutes another.
    • The focused question and its answer share the same fronting-plus-"ni" pattern.
    • Every tone-bearing syllable and dot-under letter in the final passage is accurate.
    • The passage reads naturally and persuasively aloud, with a clear pause after each "ni."

    Culture and Communication

    Culture in Context — Correction through redirection, not blunt denial

    In many Yorùbá public and community settings, correcting or disagreeing with a claim is often done through careful redirection rather than blunt denial, particularly when speaking to or about elders, officials, or a wider audience. Contrastive focus constructions are well suited to this style: they allow a speaker to acknowledge part of a claim while precisely redirecting where the emphasis should fall, as Adé does in the Model Dialogue. This chapter's grammar reflects a genuinely valued rhetorical style, not only a syntactic option.

    Regional Note — Debate and rhetorical style vary

    The pacing, directness, and formality of public argument can vary by region, setting, and speaker community; some contexts favor rapid, layered contrastive focus, while others favor slower, more measured exchanges with longer pauses between turns. The radio dialogue and community-meeting passage in this chapter are adapted, composite illustrations for instructional purposes and should not be treated as a single fixed or universal account of Yorùbá public debate.

    Common Mistakes

    Common Mistake — Dropping the resumptive pronoun in subject focus

    Error: Writing Adé ni ka ìwé náà, fronting the subject with "ni" but failing to leave the required resumptive subject pronoun in the clause.

    Correction: Write Adé ni ó ka ìwé náà, keeping the resumptive "ó" in subject position exactly as shown in the Grammar section.

    Common Mistake — Using a weak pronoun where focus requires a strong pronoun

    Error: Attempting to focus a pronoun with a weak form, producing an unnatural or ungrammatical fronted construction.

    Correction: Use the appropriate strong or emphatic pronoun whenever the focused constituent is a pronoun, since weak pronouns cannot carry the emphatic weight of a focus construction.

    Chapter Summary

    This chapter developed advanced control of "ni" focus constructions as tools of argument, correction, and persuasive rhetoric, distinguishing subject focus, object focus, predicate focus, and contrastive focus from one another and from plain declarative word order. Learners practiced coordinating focus with question formation, strong pronouns, and discourse-level argument-building, while maintaining stable tone under the pressure of emphasis and debate. No new tone, orthography, or core clause system was introduced; the chapter built rhetorical precision on focus systems already consolidated through Volume IV and the clause-level attention established in Chapter 5.

    Chapter Review

    Apá A — Ìṣàyẹ̀wò Gírámà (Grammar Check)

    1. Name the three focus types discussed in this chapter and give one brief description of each.

    2. Explain, with an example, when a resumptive pronoun is required after a focus construction and when it is not.

    3. Explain how contrastive focus differs from simple denial, with one example from this chapter.

    4. Why must a focused pronoun be a strong or emphatic pronoun rather than a weak one?

    5. Identify a focused question-and-answer pair from this chapter and explain how their structures match.

    Apá B — Ìṣàyẹ̀wò Ara Ẹni (Self-Check)

    1. Which part of this chapter's grammar do you find most difficult — subject/object focus, contrastive focus, or coordinating focus with pronouns? Why?

    2. Did you apply the Chapter 3 four-pass editing procedure to your Writing Workshop passage? What did you find?

    Ìfojúsí ẹkọ̀ tẹ́lẹ̀ — Cumulative review check

    Before moving into Chapter 7, confirm you can do the following:

    • Produce subject-focus, object-focus, and predicate-focus constructions accurately.
    • Use contrastive focus to redirect or correct a claim in argument.
    • Form a focused wh-question and a matching focused answer.
    • Coordinate strong pronouns with focus constructions without losing reference clarity.
    • Apply the Chapter 3 four-pass editing procedure to a piece of your own writing.
    • Deliver a focus construction aloud with a clear pause after "ni" and no loss of tone accuracy.

    Practical Performance Task

    Iṣẹ́ àṣepé — Abala 6

    Èsì Onífojúsùn Sí Àríyànjiyàn Gbangba — A Focused Response to a Public Claim

    Produce a complete persuasive response package built around a real or realistic public claim.

    Component 1 — Written Response

    • A 150–200 word written response to a public claim using at least three focus constructions, including one contrastive correction and one focused question-and-answer pair, fully proofread using the Chapter 3 procedure.

    Component 2 — Spoken Delivery

    • A spoken delivery of the same response, maintaining stable tone and a clear pause after each "ni," suitable for a community or radio-style setting.

    Assessment note: This task builds on the editing precision developed in Chapter 3 and the clause-level control developed in Chapter 5, and will be referenced again during the Unit 2 checkpoint at Chapter 10.

    Answer Key

    Listening Practice Questions

    1. Adé said focus is necessary because simply opposing a claim is not enough; the speaker must bring a precise correction that clearly identifies what is actually true.
    2. Adé said focus helps a listener know precisely where the error lies and where the real solution lies.
    3. Túndé said he now understood that focus is not merely decorative language but an essential tool for anyone who wants to argue with a clear, well-supported point.

    Reading Practice Questions

    1. The elder's contrastive focus construction is: "Kì í ṣe ìjọba nìkan ni ó ní láti tọ́jú ọ̀nà; àwa fúnra wa pẹ̀lú ni ó ní láti kópa" (It is not only the government that must maintain the road; we ourselves too must take part).
    2. Using focus, Bàbá Adédèjì says the real problem is: "Kì í ṣe owó nìkan ni ìṣòro náà; ìṣọ̀kan láti ṣiṣẹ́ pọ̀ ni kò sí" (It is not only money that is the problem; it is unity to work together that is lacking).
    3. According to the passage, Bàbá Adédèjì's statement made the debate change direction, leading everyone present to agree that unity was what they needed to build first, before asking the government for further help.

    Guided Practice — Sample Response

    2. Sample response: "Kì í ṣe àwọn ọ̀dọ́ nìkan ni ó jẹ̀bi; àyíká ìgbésí ayé òde-òní náà ni ó tún jẹ̀bi" ń fi ìdí méjì hàn ní ọ̀wọ̀ọ̀wọ̀: àkọ́kọ́ ni àwọn ọ̀dọ́ (tí a kọ̀ láti dá lẹ́bi nìkan), èkejì ni àyíká ìgbésí ayé òde-òní (tí a fi kún un pé ó tún jẹ̀bi).

    Chapter Review — Apá A

    Sample answers are not provided in full for open interpretive items, since responses will vary by learner. Confirm that Question 3 gives a clear example distinguishing contrastive focus from simple denial, and that Question 5 correctly identifies the parallel fronting-plus-"ni" structure shared by the focused question and its answer.

    Chapter Review — Apá B

    Self-check items have no single fixed answer. Confirm your responses against the cumulative review checklist above and your own Practical Performance Task.

    Independent Study Tools

    Fún akẹ́kọ̀ọ́ tí ń kọ́ ẹ̀kọ́ fúnra rẹ̀ — For the independent learner

    • Collect three examples of "ni" focus constructions you encounter in reading, conversation, or media, and identify whether each is subject focus, object focus, predicate focus, or contrastive focus.
    • When listening to any argument, debate, or public discussion, note where a speaker uses focus to redirect a claim rather than simply denying it.
    • Practice converting a plain declarative sentence into subject-focus, object-focus, and predicate-focus versions, and compare their rhetorical effects.
    • Continue applying the Chapter 3 four-pass editing procedure to any Yorùbá writing you produce, including persuasive and argumentative passages.

    Looking Ahead

    Ohun tí o lè ṣe báyìí — What you can do now

    You can now identify and produce subject-focus, object-focus, predicate-focus, and contrastive-focus constructions, coordinate focus with question formation and strong pronouns, and use focus deliberately to build a persuasive, well-organized argument in both speech and writing.

    Chapter 7: Specialized Domain I: Education, Research, and Knowledge Work

    Chapter 7 turns from rhetorical information structure to academic and research settings, developing your ability to operate in scholarly discourse, building on the clause-level and information-structural precision established through Chapters 5 and 6.