Business Risk Cue
A choice that increases scheduling, screening, or scope-fit exposure if left unaddressed.
Project 11
Build and test one customer intake and site-visit workflow — lead intake, project-fit screening, safe and authorized property access, documented existing conditions, organized photographs, and an estimating-ready summary — that controls every lead from first contact through handoff to estimating.
These cues appear at the point of work. They identify privacy, safety, project-fit, and documentation issues before a lead is scheduled or a property is entered.
A choice that increases scheduling, screening, or scope-fit exposure if left unaddressed.
An action that must not be taken, or must be stopped, until a specific safety, privacy, or authorization condition is satisfied.
Practical controls that keep the intake and site-visit workflow consistent from lead to lead.
Privacy, entry, and consumer-protection rules vary by state and locality. Verify current requirements before relying on this chapter.
A point where an attorney, insurer, or licensing advisor must be consulted before the workflow is finalized.
A decision, observation, or measurement that must be written down, dated, and retained in the company record system.
This project produces one working customer intake and site-visit workflow for a residential contracting business. The finished work product is a lead-intake form, a privacy notice, a project-fit screening procedure, a site-visit checklist, a photograph and measurement standard, and a site-visit summary template — tested on one live lead from first contact through a completed site visit.
You will collect only the customer information reasonably necessary for qualification and scheduling, screen the request against the Chapter 1 business model and Chapter 6 service menu, schedule and confirm the visit, obtain permission before entering the property or photographing it, document existing conditions and hazards, and produce an estimating-ready summary that is routed to estimating, design, licensing, and project-management review.
This project depends directly on the Chapter 1 Business Model Statement, the Chapter 1 customer-fit and project-fit checklist, and the Chapter 6 scope library. It feeds directly into Chapter 7 pricing, Chapter 8 proposals, and Chapter 12 sales follow-up.
This project builds directly on the Chapter 1 business model, which defines the target customer, geographic service area, and project-size range this workflow screens against, and on the Chapter 6 scope library, which supplies the service categories used to route each lead. It also depends on the Chapter 2 company record system for secure storage of customer information and photographs.
The site-visit summary produced here is the direct input to the Chapter 7 pricing worksheet and the Chapter 8 estimate and proposal templates. The same project-fit screening discipline reappears in the Chapter 12 sales pipeline and the Chapter 13 job startup packet, where a project that was never properly screened here becomes a project that is never properly priced or started there.
This project covers:
This project does not authorize the learner to:
Any hazardous condition discovered during the visit must be documented and escalated using the emergency-referral process in Section F below rather than addressed as part of a normal sales visit.
Establish these references before building the workflow, and do not change their meaning mid-document.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Lead | An unqualified customer inquiry that has not yet been screened against the business model |
| Qualified lead | A lead that has passed project-fit screening and is scheduled for a site visit |
| Site visit | The scheduled, permission-based visit to a property to observe and record existing conditions |
| Existing condition | A visually observable feature of the property recorded factually, without diagnosis of cause |
| Emergency referral | A condition observed or reported that should not wait for a normal sales visit and is routed to an immediate response process |
| Decision maker | The property owner, co-owner, tenant, manager, designer, insurer, or lender with authority to accept the project |
| Site-visit summary | The single document produced by this chapter that carries observations, assumptions, photographs, and scope candidates to estimating |
Before the workflow is used on a live lead, record the following on the site-visit summary template:
Company name: ______ Approved business model reference: ______ Approved scope library revision: ______
Date workflow tested: ____________ Reviewing professional: ____________ Approval date: ____________
Every lead moves through the same four checkpoints before it becomes an estimate: intake, screening, scheduled and authorized access, and a documented summary. Skipping or informally handling any checkpoint is the most common cause of wasted estimating time, unsafe or unauthorized property entry, and inconsistent customer screening.
A lead is only scheduled for a site visit after it has been checked against the Chapter 1 business model's target customer, geographic service area, and project-size range, and against the Chapter 6 service menu. A lead that fails this check is marked refer, decline, or waitlist on the intake record; it is not silently dropped and it is not scheduled "to be safe."
When a lead is accepted, referred, declined, or waitlisted in Section F, record the decision and the specific reason on the intake form. Do not leave the disposition of a lead undocumented. The screening record protects the business from inconsistent, unrecorded, or discriminatory lead handling.
Do not enter a property, open an access panel, operate a fixture, move an object, or photograph an area without permission confirmed before the visit. Permission assumed from a scheduled appointment alone is not confirmed permission for these specific actions.
A reported or observed active leak, fire hazard, structural movement, electrical hazard, gas odor, sewage, or other unsafe condition is routed through the emergency-referral process in Section F, Step 7, not scheduled as a routine estimating visit.
The privacy notice, data-collection scope, and project-fit screening criteria used in this workflow must be reviewed by an attorney or licensing advisor to confirm they satisfy applicable privacy and nondiscrimination requirements before the workflow is approved for regular use.
PC-061 – PC-066
Customer Intake / Site Documentation
Quantity: one lead-intake form, one privacy notice and access rule, one project-fit screening procedure referencing the Chapter 1 checklist, one site-visit checklist, one photograph and measurement standard, and one completed site-visit summary from a live test lead, each dated and stored in the company record system.
| Document | Quantity | Format | Content Required | Preparation / Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead-Intake Form | 1 | Structured form, digital or paper | Customer, property, referral, service request, urgency, and known history | First point of documented contact with every lead |
| Privacy Notice and Access Rule | 1 | One-page notice | What data is collected, why, and who may access it | Discloses data practices to the customer and controls internal access |
| Site-Visit Checklist | 1 | Field checklist | Hazard screening, permission confirmation, measurement and photo sequence, existing-condition prompts | Used on-site to keep the visit consistent and complete |
| Site-Visit Summary | 1 per lead | Structured summary document | Observations, assumptions, missing information, photographs, scope candidates, follow-up actions | Estimating-ready handoff document routed to estimating, design, licensing, and project management |
| Check | Standard |
|---|---|
| Intake completeness | Only information reasonably necessary for qualification and scheduling is collected, and the privacy notice is provided |
| Screening consistency | Every lead receives a documented accept, refer, decline, or waitlist decision using the same criteria |
| Emergency handling | Any reported hazardous condition is routed through the emergency-referral process rather than scheduled as a routine visit |
| Permission confirmation | Entry, photography, panel access, and object movement each have permission confirmed and recorded before they occur |
| Measurement consistency | Approved areas are measured using the same stated method on every visit |
| Photograph organization | Every photograph carries an identifier linking it to a room, elevation, or scope item |
| Summary separation | Customer-stated goals are recorded separately from field observations, with no unsupported diagnosis |
| Handoff | The completed summary is routed to estimating, design, licensing, and project-management review and archived |
| Component | Quantity | Content | Source Step |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer goals section | 1 | Customer's stated outcome, priorities, budget, and schedule constraints | Section G, Steps 23, 30 |
| Field observation section | 1 | Existing conditions, hazards, damage, and access notes recorded without diagnosis | Section G, Steps 23, 29 |
| Measurement record | 1 per approved area | Dimensions of each approved area using the stated method | Section G, Step 24 |
| Photograph log | 1 entry per photograph | Room/elevation identifier, description, and permission confirmation | Section G, Steps 25–26 |
| Scope candidates and follow-up actions | 1 | Likely scope boundaries, exclusions, and required next steps | Section G, Step 31 |
Inspect the completed workflow and its test-case documents using the same checks regardless of which lead or service category is involved.
Complete the Workflow Approval Worksheet in the Inspection Checklist section below before beginning Project 12.
Probable cause: the project-fit screening in Section F was skipped or applied inconsistently.
Confirmation: compare the lead's service, location, and project size against the Chapter 1 business model and the recorded screening decision.
Correction: apply the screening criteria and assign the correct accept, refer, decline, or waitlist status before estimating time is spent.
Reinspection: repeat the screening check on the corrected intake record and on the next several new leads.
Probable cause: permission was assumed from the scheduled appointment rather than confirmed specifically for photography at the start of the visit.
Confirmation: check the site-visit checklist for a recorded permission confirmation preceding the photograph log entries.
Correction: obtain explicit permission before any further photography and remove any photograph taken without it from the summary.
Reinspection: repeat the permission check on the corrected summary before it is routed to estimating.
Probable cause: the observation was written as a conclusion about cause rather than a description of what was visually observed.
Confirmation: review each observation for language that states a cause rather than a visible condition.
Correction: rewrite the observation to describe only what was seen and flag it for specialty-trade evaluation if a cause must be determined.
Reinspection: repeat the summary-separation check on the corrected document.
Probable cause: the intake screening in Section F, Step 6 did not ask directly about hazardous conditions, or the answer was not escalated.
Confirmation: review the intake record for the hazard-screening questions and compare against the emergency-referral log.
Correction: route the condition through the emergency-referral process immediately and document the escalation.
Reinspection: repeat the emergency-handling check on the corrected record and confirm the referral process functioned.
Probable cause: the summary was completed but not sent to every required reviewer, or the routing date was not recorded.
Confirmation: check the summary for a routing record showing estimating, design, licensing, and project-management review.
Correction: route the summary to any missing reviewer and record the date before estimating proceeds.
Reinspection: repeat the handoff check on the corrected summary.
Probable cause: the intake form was not reviewed against the qualification-and-scheduling standard before use.
Confirmation: review each field on the intake form and ask whether it is necessary for qualification or scheduling.
Correction: remove any unnecessary field and update the privacy notice to match the corrected data-collection scope.
Reinspection: repeat the intake check on the corrected form before it is used on the next lead.
This project ends with the tested workflow and its sample documents filed for reuse, not left as informal notes.
| Competency | Independent Pass Standard | Not Demonstrated | With Assistance | Independently |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC-061 | Collects only the customer information reasonably necessary for qualification and scheduling and provides the privacy notice | |||
| PC-062 | Screens a project request against the approved business model and service menu using consistent, nondiscriminatory, documented criteria | |||
| PC-063 | Schedules a site visit with confirmed date, arrival window, access, and safety instructions, and confirms permission before entry | |||
| PC-064 | Documents existing conditions using a consistent measurement method and a structured, factual observation record | |||
| PC-065 | Photographs project areas with confirmed permission and consistent identifiers linking each photograph to a room, elevation, or scope item | |||
| PC-066 | Prepares a complete site-visit summary and routes it to estimating, design, licensing, and project-management review |
Mark one column per competency. Only Demonstrated Independently awards the competency; Demonstrated with Assistance authorizes additional supervised practice but does not complete the requirement.
| Item | Standard | Complete (Y/N) | Notes / Correction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead-intake form and privacy notice | Collects only necessary data; privacy notice reviewed and provided | ||
| Project-fit screening | Test lead screened against Chapter 1 model and Chapter 6 service menu; decision documented | ||
| Emergency-referral process | Defined and, if triggered, correctly applied to the test lead | ||
| Scheduling and confirmation | Date, arrival window, access, parking, pets, and safety instructions recorded | ||
| Permission confirmation | Entry, photography, panel access, and object movement each confirmed before occurring | ||
| Measurement record | Approved areas measured using a stated consistent method | ||
| Photograph log | Every photograph carries a room, elevation, or scope-item identifier | ||
| Summary separation | Customer goals and field observations in separate sections; no unsupported diagnosis | ||
| Routing and archive | Summary routed to estimating, design, licensing, and project management; record archived | ||
| Professional review completed | Reviewer named; comments on privacy notice and entry procedure recorded and addressed |
Workflow declared complete: ______ (Pass/Fail) Date: ____________ Owner name: ____________
Reviewing professional: ____________ Next scheduled review date: ____________
With the workflow built and tested on one live lead, review the completed documents against the Acceptance Standards table and confirm the intake form collects only necessary information with a provided privacy notice, the screening decision is documented and consistent with the Chapter 1 business model, any hazardous condition was routed through the emergency-referral process, permission was confirmed before entry and photography, measurements used a stated consistent method, every photograph carries an identifier, the summary separates customer goals from field observations without unsupported diagnosis, and the summary was routed to and archived for estimating, design, licensing, and project-management review. Complete the Workflow Approval Worksheet and correct any failed item before beginning Project 12. If an item fails, identify whether the gap is in intake scope, screening consistency, permission confirmation, documentation method, or handoff routing before revising the workflow.
You have completed the eleventh project in the professional-contractor sequence: creating a customer intake and site-visit workflow. This project required you to collect only necessary customer information under a privacy notice (PC-061), screen the request against the approved business model and service menu (PC-062), schedule a confirmed and safe site visit (PC-063), document existing conditions with a consistent measurement method (PC-064), photograph project areas with permission and consistent identifiers (PC-065), and prepare and route an estimating-ready site-visit summary (PC-066).
You now have a tested lead-intake form, privacy notice, project-fit screening procedure, site-visit checklist, and site-visit summary, together with one completed sample summary from a live lead. That summary carries directly into the next project: building a sales follow-up and communication system that tracks this lead, and every future lead, from proposal through decision.
Store your approved workflow templates and the completed sample site-visit summary in a secure, controlled location. You will reference this exact workflow in every remaining chapter that touches a customer lead.